‘THEY’ WENT INTO PANIC WHEN NATALEE REMAINED ‘PASSED OUT’
The Natalee Case…Dutch official report shows
‘THEY’ WENT INTO PANIC WHEN NATALEE REMAINED ‘PASSED OUT’
Oranjestad (AAN) As promised to the peoples of Aruba and the U.S.A., DIARIO will continue with its investigation on the missing girl, Natalee Holloway, and will publish legitimate documents accompanied by analysis and questions that sooner or later will bring out the truth.
Today, the investigative team of DIARIO is publishing part of an official report given by a Dutch police officer who came to Aruba to interrogate Joran van der Sloot among others.
The Dutch police officer states that Joran van Der Sloot is aware of the possibility that exists that one day the American authorities will ask for his extradition due to the fact that the missing girl (Natalee) is an American Citizen. Joran’s reaction was that he began to laugh!
Now Joran began to laugh because he was afraid or because he felt reassured because he was told beforehand that “no body, no crime”?
From this same official report one can deduct that Joran again throws the ball in Deepak Kalpoe’s corner, because he tells the Dutch officer that if they interrogate Deepak in the same manner that they interrogated Joran, then Deepak for sure will tell the truth. Which truth? How come the Dutch police officer did not ask Van der Sloot about which truth he was referring to?
Joran also said that if some weeks before they had interrogated him in the aforementioned manner, then the truth would have come out much faster!
Again the question remains: to what truth is Joran referring to? The supposed truth that he left Natalee behind all alone on the beach? That is the truth that he so heavily sustained during so many weeks with his mouth closed, turn all sorts of story around, remain without speaking, become fresh with the police interrogators, come every time with a different story to contradict other stories, and that show that he had been lying from the beginning?
The question now is: what is Joran referring to with this ‘different form of interrogation’?
How come they did not continue with this ‘different form of interrogation’ of the suspects, to determine what happened to Natalee and where Natalee is?
The culminating part of this procesvebaal (official report) is that when the police officer mentioned the ollowing: “I, De Ruiter, mentioned to Van der Sloot that there was no interest in lying to him about this fact (he is referring to the declaration of Freddy Zedan Arambatzis) because the importance of the declaration made by the witness Zedan Arambatzis, was directed towards the fact that Joran had already on the 30th of May told Freddy the story about the Holliday Inn and that Joran told Freddy also that “they” went into panic when Natalee remained “passed out”!
Everyone can read today what was put black on white “Dat ze” went into panic, and the “Ze” here in Dutch hows that more than one person was involved in that part about entering into panic, because “ze” is plural.
There is nowhere in this official report that Joran hurriedly contradicted the Dutch police when reference was made to “They” entered into panic and said that there were no other people involved!
Seeing that the Dutch officer himself mentions that “they” entered into panic, according to the declaration of Freddy Zedan, then there were more than one person involved and everyone can reach his own conclusion that Freddy Zedan knows those who he himself referred to as “they”, or in Papiamento “nan”. “They” went into panic when Natalee remained passed out! This means that more than one person was present when Natalee remained passed out and where are these people who were with Natalee when she remained passed out? On the beach like “they” want the police and everyone else to believe, or elsewhere? Do they who belong to the group referred to as “they” realize now that the circle is slowly closing around “them”? For those who understand what this means, few words are necessary!
The strange part is that Joran declared to the Dutch policeman based on his questions, that he had recently spoken to the witness Freddy Zedan Arambatzis, and that during that conversation, Joran asked Freddy why he mentioned the date of 30 May, and Van der Sloot told the policeman that he (Freddy) just mentioned a date and that the witness in truth heard the story from Van der Sloot himself the day after Natalee disappeared.
Here’s another point in the investigation that proves very controversial and even questions severely the fact that a suspect in police custody or is under investigation, even has the possibility and facility to speak to one of the witnesses, that is Freddy Zedan Arambatzis.
In which part of the world can a suspect under police investigation for the disappearance of someone, get the possibility to speak to a witness who is his friend?
On which day did Joran speak with Freddy, where and who gave Joran (while in police custody) the great privilege to speak to a witness who can declare in his favor?
Reading the expositions of the Dutch police officer, who mentioned extradition to Joran, sources in the U.S. are indicating that they are waiting for the opportune moment to ask for the extradition of Joran van der Sloot, the brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, Freddy Arambatzis, and other names that have not yet been made public.
Preparations can be under way to petition internationally for an order of arrest via the Interpol for those who the U.S. wants to extradite because, as those sources say, they will get them any part of the world and will bring them to justice; in Aruba they won’t get as many years in prison like in the U.S.